[Music] hi in this section we're going to cover how buy in version 8 maps to csdn version 3.0 a little bit about buy-in buy-in stands for the banking industry architecture network and it was formed to really bring the different banking entities together to talk about how banks are structured and what they do and and sort of how they do it of course there are unique things in banking and and the driver for this was the along its history of m a uh so you can go to buying.org and kind of see what they have to offer the main differences and similarities with csdm so in csdm we really focused on how digital products and services are managed throughout their lifecycle whereas bayen defines largely soa and semantic definition model for how it services back the banking industry so there's a common set of services as you can imagine money needs to flow from bank to bank and there has to be some level of commonality the use of csdm of course is part of our platform it's kind of a common across all of the different products that we sell that use common information about it and the digital products and services and by end it is a vendor agnostic framework that's focused on the banking industry alone it's very specific to that banking industry and what we're finding is that there are also some enterprise architecture concepts in there that align pretty well with things like toga the origin of csdm it's a relatively new framework for us in servicenow came about in 2018 it's a collaboration between a number of product units that came together internally to to agree on what those common definitions are and what that model looks like across our platform buying it's been around for a while from the 1990s and it's driven by largely by that banking industry what you found is a lot of m a in that industry as well through that time frame and that really needed to uh provide a more common way of looking at banks and so you'll see the interoperability the m a sort of the consolidation that happened they had a much heavier i would say influence on from an enterprise architecture to help through those m a and interoperability issues between banks this is the bio model on the left and what we see in is the cst model on the right and what you'll see is these four different areas of biome these four areas are very well aligned with toe gap which is a common enterprise architecture framework will find in the market the first thing that really wanted to highlight is the business area where we have business domain and service domain that largely aligns with the foundation domains of company business unit department when you look at the strategy layer in that strategy layer that's kind of what you're looking at is what the business is doing how how things are working how things are structured from a business point of view there's a pretty what much one-to-one capability capability-based planning mapping here so business capabilities map to our business capabilities and i think the definition is pretty well aligned there and we have also a mapping between the application service to our two objects business application and application service in the buy-in model they don't really have the separation between the business app and app service they just have one application service definition but the if you look at the definition it pretty much aligns with business application and not specific to application service in that they don't separate out different installs or different environments so that's something to keep in mind the data object for the most part uh aligns with our information object at this level uh of course in cstm we have a higher level which is data domain as well which could also be used that might align with data objects as well as possibly business objects within the buy-in model the next area is the business service the business service aligns largely with the business service and the business service offering in csdm so there's a pretty good alignment there they don't break out in buy-in offerings uh we do so that's a bit of a difference and the other thing i wanted to mention is that buy-in has what they call a service landscape they have a set set of services which define what these happen to be now the interesting thing about these service landscapes it could be used in a couple different areas but uh for the business service obviously but we'll we'll look at this a little bit more closely in a minute this is a blow up of the actual buy-in service landscape so if you're in the banking industry you would recognize a lot of these things that you would do loans deposits trade banking market operations things in the middle that are very specific to to banks and there's going to be some generic things like it management is generic and uh non-it and hr enterprise services so those are the things that you do in any company but there's a lot of very banking unique things here as well now i wanted to kind of point out two sort of use cases that we have with these buy-in service landscapes we typically see them used in a couple different areas but the first thing i wanted to point out is there's a strong synergy with the business service definition and the yellow things the things at the lowest level of this banking service landscape hierarchy if you can see that it does break down in the yellow elements are the lowest level which correlate to the business services now the next level up as you look at the hierarchy relate pretty well with the service portfolio as you develop a hierarchy of services this is the higher level aggregations and where you can do some roll-ups of reporting and that sort of thing and then we have a strong synergy with business capabilities when i saw the buy-in service landscape i see a lot of folks using this as a starting point for identifying what their business capabilities are and be able to define those of course there is a mapping to buy in already to the business capability uh the ones that they define there and of course what we define in cstm but it's not uncommon to use these kind of hierarchies in the capability design thank you very much this has been the buy-in discussion uh mapping around buy-in and cstm